Abolition Democracy through Fiction and Nonfiction Literature

Writing, Social Justice

Abolition Democracy through Fiction and Nonfiction Literature

Vivian Nixon, Ph.D.
Intersectional and multidisciplinary examination of fiction and non-fiction literature and social science as it relates to theories of abolition democracy.
Print All

Description

This course will examine two select novels by Nobel laureate and Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist, Toni Morrison and three contemporary nonfiction works in the social sciences by Reuben Jonathan Miller, Bruce Western, and Danielle Sered. Together, the novels and the nonfiction work embody an intersectional and multidisciplinary to literature and social science as they relate to theories of abolition democracy. Readings are drawn from classic American Fiction, social science research, ethnography and practitioner expertise. An intersectional and cross disciplinary approach will incorporate race, gender, social policy, structural violence, and culture in experiences uniquely shared by Blacks, the Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC)—particularly Black people–across the borders of economic status and locality. The fictional and non-fiction narratives encounter and interrogate a broad array of tough circumstances and behaviors: infanticide, romantic relationships, male dominance, white supremacy, interpersonal and institutional violence, family dynamics and tensions, socio-economic conditions, cultural survival, etc. Morrison’s novels are esteemed in the Black American literary tradition and she is among few Black women that hold equal esteem in the larger literary canon.  Miller, Western, and Sered have written distinct non-fiction works exploring various aspects of U.S. systems of mass punishment. These works combine to offer narrative framing and empirical evidence that informs a complex perspective on three practices deeply rooted in American culture and society:  white supremacy, punishment, and violence.

Topics/ Learning Objectives

This is a seminar. While there will be brief talks and viewing of films or film clips, much of the seminar will be a dialogue between students and instructors. It is essential that you come to class prepared to engage in conversation. 

Your interest in your classmates’ thoughts and ideas is appreciated in a seminar. All opinions are valid. There are no silly questions. There are no right or wrong answers—unless we discuss hardcore facts. There is no such thing as a wrong opinion. We can disagree respectfully. It is of utmost importance that we honor one another’s humanity and respect that there may be topics discussed to which some have extreme sensitivity.

Schedule and Assignments

Readings:

Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 1-2

Pushout Chapters 1-2

  1. Class introductions
  2. Syllabus Review
  3. Discussion of Pushout Film
  4. Discussion of readings
  5. Wrap – up go over next week’s assignments 5 Minutes 

Turn in reflection paper on film Pushout

Readings: 

  1. Changing Minds. Collaborative Research by The Graduate Center of the City University of New York & Women in Prison at the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility Michelle Fine, Maria Elena Torre, Kathy Boudin, Iris Bowen, Judith Clark, Donna Hylton, Migdalia Martinez, “Missy”, Rosemarie A. Roberts, Pamela Smart, Debora Upegui with a Reincarceration Analysis conducted by The New York State Department of Correctional Services. September 2001.
  2. Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 3-8
  3. Pushout Chapters 3-4 (If you have not already, please read Intro and forward)

Video:

  1. Ellen Condliffe Lagemann. 2015 AERA Distinguished Lecture College in Prison: A Cause in Need of Advocacy and Research 

Readings:

  1. The politics and Paradox of Teaching Higher Education in Women’s Prisons by Breea Chaunte Willingham May 2014
  2. Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 9-13
  3. Pushout Chapters 5 and Epilogue

Turn in reflection paper on Changing Minds

Video:

  1. College Behind Bars, Part 1

Readings:

  1. Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 14-18
  2. Pushout Chapters Appendix A, Appendix B and Methodology
Video:
  1. College Behind Bars, Part 2

Readings:
  1. Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 19-24
  2. Reading:  Prison Higher Education and Social Transformation.  Jody Lewen SOCIAL INEQUALITY AND THE U.S. PRISON SYSTEM
  3. New York Women’s Foundation Report Rikers
  4. New York Women’s Foundation Report Adult Women
Video:
  1. College Behind Bars, Part 3

Reading:
  1. Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 25-30
  2. Reading:  Education in Prison and the Self-Stigma: Empowerment Continuum. Douglas N. Evans, Emily Pelletier, and Jason Szkola
  3. Essie Justice Report:  Because She’s Powerful
Video:
  1. College Behind Bars, Part 4

Reading:
  1. Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 31-35
  2. Reading:   Daniel Karpowitz.; College in Prison : Reading in an Age of Mass Incarceration. Chapter 1. Getting In. Conflicting Voices and the Politics of College in Prison

Turn in reflection paper on College Behind Bars


Readings:
  1. Beyond Recidivism Author(s): Emily Pelletier and Douglas Evans. Source: Journal of Correctional Education (1974-) , Vol. 70, No. 2 (August 2019), pp. 49-68. Published by: Correctional Education Association 
  2. Becoming Ms. Burton Chapters 36-39
  3. Johns Hopkins University Press. W.E.B. DuBois The Non-Market Benefits of Higher Education
  4. Homegrown Social Capital

Turn in reflection paper on Becoming Ms. Burton

Group Discussion:

Share what you wrote about.

Turn in Final reflection paper:  Topic of choice from the entire seminar.

Should anyone be incarcerated for life is a question our nation must grapple with.  In fact, we are grappling with whether prisons should exist at all.  However, for now, prisons do exist.  So, if we have prisons, why, or why not, should we educate people in them?  Does education have specific benefits for women, women of color, why?  These are sample questions to consider as you search for a topic.

Expectations and Assessments

Students will be successful if they complete the required reading, attend each course session, and take part in class discussions. 

One Reflection paper of 2-3 pages is due each week, beginning with the second session. Each reflection paper must be based on the combined readings for the meeting but should not be a retelling of the readings. The paper should reflect your thoughts after integrating the readings.  When writing your reflections, consider current events, your prior perceptions about American Criminal Legal Systems, or a new line of thinking you are developing based on the readings. The reflection must represent your thinking and not merely a summarized repetition of the readings.